"Without respect or grounds." "Is the misjudgment the corporate team's fault?" Anyang owner stops insisting on crossing the line
"Without respect or grounds." "Is the misjudgment the corporate team's fault?" Anyang owner stops insisting on crossing the line
Blog Article
According to this logic, shouldn't we divide the leagues where corporate teams play and civic teams play? However, some claim that the referee's decision is due to "corporate teams" cannot be understood.
Anyang Mayor and Anyang owner Choi Dae-ho held an emergency press conference on the referee's judgment at the media room of Anyang Sports Complex at 2 p.m. on the 20th, expressing dissatisfaction with the referee's judgment on the recent game, and at the same time indiscriminately shooting corporate clubs, causing a great shock by attempting to separate inside the K-League.
Immediately after the press conference began, Mayor Choi Dae-ho said, "As Anyang owner, I sat here with a very heavy sense of responsibility and regret. We decided that we could no longer remain silent about the unfair refereeing decisions that have occurred repeatedly in Anyang's recent various games. It is not just a matter of Anyang, but a situation that is directly connected to the entire K-League," and shouted, "We need to emphasize the fairness of refereeing decisions," "We need to officially recognize and disclose the misjudgment," and "We need to reexamine the clause banning criticism of referees."
Immediately after the remarks, Anyang officials explained where they were judged unfair and unreasonable, mentioning Jeonbuk Hyundai in the sixth round of the K League 1 on March 30, the round of 16 at the Korea Cup on May 14, the match against Pohang Steelers in the eighth round of the K League 1 on April 12, the match against FC Seoul in the 12th round on May 6, and the match against Jeonbuk in the 14th round on May 17.
And Mayor Choi Dae-ho said, "It is ridiculous that a bad judgment can determine victory or defeat. There is a problem with the quality of the referee and there is also a problem with the VOR, which has absolute power, and the supervisor. The education of the referee is necessary and the disclosure of information is required. It should be judged objectively and transparently. It is not just a problem of Anyang, it is a problem of Korean soccer. I will fight and demand to the end. The disciplinary committee will be held 100 or 1,000 times. There is nothing to be afraid of. I have a responsibility to correct what is wrong."
Some scenes, such as Choi Jun's penalty kick against Seoul, were not misjudgment, but it could be regarded as a natural complaint from Anyang that the team could have about refereeing. However, Choi's subsequent remarks gave a big shock. "There are more than 40 civic teams, but not many corporate teams," Choi said.
"The K-League is managed by one of the few corporate teams," he said. "We need to improve it. Citizens' teams that operate with taxpayers' money are working hard even in the face of difficulties, but the current decision, which is concerned about corporate teams, needs to be innovated and changed," he said, raising a ridiculous conspiracy theory that corporate teams are holding back civic teams.
He even left a shocking comment on the question-and-answer question. Asked why he said discrimination between corporate teams and civic teams is severe, Mayor Choi Dae-ho said, "If we limit ourselves to K League 1 teams, the annual salary gap is approximately three times higher. We will take all the good players with us. Civic teams like us commit, struggle, and sacrifice even in difficult circumstances. In reality, it is possible, but the rules can be applied fairly. If I speak on behalf of some civic teams, I heard that they have complaints."
They literally split into two teams in the league as if they were victimized. The scenes that Anyang raised issue with were intentionally presented only to corporate teams as if they were intentionally arranged in line with their claims. It was only seen as a video clip that was put together as if a civic club meets a civic club, and there is no mistrial. In fact, any fan or official watching the K-League game can know, but it was only absurd that the judgment against the former fell when civic and corporate clubs met.
If Mayor Choi Dae-ho's argument is true, corporate teams should never go down to the bottom under the 토토사이트 K-League system. However, when corporate teams were shaken, they were shaken up. In fact, corporate teams were demoted and failed to advance to the K-League for one season, and Seoul or Jeonbuk even went up to the playoffs. Even if there is an error in the judging system, it is not an intentional act to take care of corporate teams.
According to the current K-League rankings, Gimcheon Sangmu ranks fourth (24 points) and Gwangju FC (22 points) are fifth among the civic teams. Jeju United is rather lower than Anyang in the corporate league with 12 points. Would this ranking have made sense if the K-League had been ruled by a small number of corporate teams as Choi said?
Anyang's value plummeted due to Choi's words and actions, which used only "judgment judgment" for their poor performance and continued to criticize "corporate clubs" and league fairness without reason. Even if someone says Anyang performs well afterwards, it can't be denied even if it's thanks to Choi's pressure, not their own strength.
Fans who listen to Choi's comment are also cold. Many fans strongly criticize why Choi criticized only corporate teams in his SNS account. If you want to win respect, you have to respect the other team first. These include fairness, fairness in judgment, and respect for opposing teams.
Anyang and Choi, however, only put a disgrace on their own face by making reckless accusations of the ruling and dividing them from corporate teams. We need an early apology.